Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Campus
Life
Campus
Life
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
Stories Stories
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Degree Program Degree Program
Executive certificates Executive certificates
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Article

Why CEOs Nearing Retirement are Averse to Risk

Human Resources
Published on:

The rising number of press articles attributing the success and failure of major firms to their CEOs led Matta and Beamish to study the CEOs role in strategic decision-making. How did CEOs influence their company’s long-term investments?

photo: Why CEOs Nearing Retirement are Averse to Risk

Key ideas

•The reluctance of CEOs approaching retirement to engage in short-term risk-taking can be detrimental to company growth.
•This aversion to risk is based on two concerns:

(1) CEOs are not keen to taking risks that may taint their reputations in their final years;

(2) they want to preserve their assets (which are in part indexed to the company’s stock value) from any loss in value.
•The remuneration model that indexes part of the CEO’s compensation upon retirement to company stock value can be damaging for the company.

The two researchers provide an initial answer to this question by examining the risk-taking behaviour of CEOs nearing retirement in the context of international acquisitions.

Why was international acquisitions chosen as the context for the study?

Elie Matta and Paul W. Beamish studied the international acquisitions made by 293 major American firms between 1995 and 1999. By studying acquisitions (as opposed to R&D investments, for instance, which are part of a more long-term strategy —less variable and more visible), the researchers were able to focus on short-term decisions that directly involved the CEO.

The empirical study of international acquisitions made in the second half of the 1990s, incurring significant up-front costs, was particularly interesting as it revived the notion of managerial risk-taking. Elie Matta points out, however, that although the study uses acquisitions for its context, the theoretical arguments of the study can be applied to risk-taking in general.

The impact of career horizon on risktaking

The two researchers’ observations show that CEOs with shorter career horizons are less likely to engage in international acquisitions. Elie Matta explains that CEOs approaching retirement avoid risky strategic choices, as returns often cannot be predicted. The application of the agency theory, which suggests that attempting to align the CEO’s (agent) decision horizon with shareholders’ (principals) interests by enlisting the former to commit to ensuring the company’s long-term financial performance, does not produce the desired results as the CEO nears retirement.

By integrating behavioural arguments (prospect theory), the researchers suggest that the CEO’s aversion to loss (heightened close to retirement) encourages him to make decisions that maintain stability in the medium term, whereas shareholders would prefer decisions aimed at ensuring the company’s future growth. This explains the gap between CEOs’ short-term reasoning as they near retirement (and who therefore lose interest in the company’s future results) and the shareholders’ long-term interests.

The reasons for CEOs' risk aversion as they approach retirement

Elie Matta and Paul W. Beamish suggest two reasons for this phenomenon:

• The desire to maintain an image: CEOs are particularly concerned about preserving a legacy of success. The last years of a CEO’s career are crucial to his image: it is difficult to reverse a performance downfall in the last three years of a career. As people are more inclined to remember recent and not past results, such a failure could ruin an otherwise successful career. The CEO’s aversion to risk therefore increases when he knows that they will soon be leaving the company.

• The desire to maintain their wealth: CEOs accumulate various forms of compensation, combining fixed salary with variable payments. Payment may also take the form of stock options or shares. A CEO's retirement package (which is accumulated wealth) is directly linked to their shares in the company's stock, as retirement presents an opportunity to “cash-out.” Thus, there is a close correlation between CEOs with significant levels of accumulated wealth and their desire to maximize the value of personal shares and investments, and hence avoid investments that could result in fluctuations in shares prices just prior to retirement.

A model that damages the company's long-term growth

The study’s results raise an additional question: can CEOs' aversion to short-term risk when approaching retirement be detrimental to the company's growth? The authors note that the average age of newly appointed CEOs is 58, which is only seven to twelve years before the age of retirement.

Risky strategic decisions therefore depend on the compensation structure, adjusted in accordance with the career horizon. Since a company's long-term growth is directly linked to its capacity to make risky investments, the remuneration model that indexes a large part of the CEO's pay to company stock value can be damaging when a CEO is approaching retirement !

Applications

Focus - Application pour les marques
The methodology could be applied immediately. Professor Pérignon is cautiously optimistic about the Basel Committee adopting the suggested improvement concerning the foreign exchange effect. He is less confident that it will drop the cap system, highlighting the fact that US lobbyists have so far been very good at getting the system to protect their banks: “They decided to lower the capital of the largest custodian banks (high substitutability score), all of them being US banks,” he notes. The researchers put together a website, sifiwatch.org, with all the data they collected about SIFIs. Every year, the website also discloses the new list of SIFIs, several months before the official announcement by the Financial Stability Board, with so far remarkable accuracy. “The economic impact of SIFIs is huge, but the risk data for these banks are not available in a centralized way and sometimes hard to get. Our website provides transparency,” says Pérignon. Last but not least, their methodology is potentially applicable to sectors that require similar risk scoring, such as insurance or asset management.

Methodology

Focus - Methodologie
The researchers collected regulatory data for a sample of 119 global banks from 22 countries between 2014 and 2016. They obtained data on leading European banks from the European Banking Authority and data on large US banks from the Banking Organization Systemic Risk Report. But they had to crawl the individual websites of sample banks outside the US and the EU, including sites in Chinese, to gather data indicating systemic risk (including contagion, amplification mechanisms, etc.).
Based on an interview with Elie Matta and his article “The Accentuated CEO Career Horizon Problem: Evidence from International Acquisitions” (Strategic Management Journal , July 2008), co-written with Paul W. Beamish.
Related topics:
Human Resources
Strategy

Related content on Human Resources

black man happy in front of glass buildings
Economics

To Attract and Retain Top Talent, Firms Sell Themselves as Springboards to a Great Career

By Raphaël Levy

woman walking on a double path_thumbnail
Human Resources

Specialize or Generalize: What Makes Jobseekers Choose One Career Strategy Over Another?

By Roxana Barbulescu

mosaic of images_thumbnail
Human Resources

How to Handle People’s Data Ethically

By Michael Segalla, Dominique Rouziès

Human Resources

How Much Control Do You Really Have Over Your Career?

By Roxana Barbulescu

burnout_thumbnail
Human Resources

When Does Pressure to Do Extra Work Drain Staff and Threaten Home Life?

By Ekaterina Netchaeva