Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC Faculty & Research Faculty & Research Master’s programs Master’s programs MBA Programs MBA Programs PhD Program PhD Program Executive Education Executive Education Summer School Summer School HEC Online HEC Online About HEC Overview Overview Who We Are Who We Are Egalité des chances Egalité des chances Career Center Career Center International International Campus Life Campus Life Stories Stories The HEC Foundation The HEC Foundation Coronavirus Coronavirus Faculty & Research Overview Overview Faculty Directory Faculty Directory Departments Departments Centers Centers Chairs Chairs Knowledge Knowledge Master’s programs Master in
Management Master in
Management
MSc International
Finance MSc International
Finance
Specialized
Masters Specialized
Masters
X-HEC
programs X-HEC
programs
Dual-Degree
programs Dual-Degree
programs
Visiting
students Visiting
students
Certificates Certificates Student
Life Student
Life
Student
Stories Student
Stories
MBA Programs MBA MBA Executive MBA Executive MBA TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA PhD Program Overview Overview HEC Difference HEC Difference Program details Program details Research areas Research areas HEC Community HEC Community Placement Placement Job Market Job Market Admissions Admissions Financing Financing Executive Education Executive Masters Executive Masters Executive Certificates Executive Certificates Executive short programs Executive short programs Online Online Train your teams Train your teams Executive MBA Executive MBA Summer School Summer programs Summer programs Youth Leadership Initiative Youth Leadership Initiative Admissions Admissions FAQ FAQ HEC Online Overview Overview Degree Program Degree Program Executive certificates Executive certificates MOOCs MOOCs

Instant

The Challenge of Different National Leaderships for Tackling Covid-19

Governance

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, we observe starkly divergent approaches being experimented across the European Union. In this interview, Alberto Alemanno, Jean Monnet Professor of European Union Law at HEC Paris, explains this lack of coordination between the governments and its consequences, and shares his insights on what could be improved in this diverse decision-making setting.

leaders on a map of Europe
Cover Photo Credits: ©ronstik on AdobeStock

Why didn't the EU countries collaborate to decide one and timely response?

The EU cannot close schools, suspend football matches or lock down European cities. It cannot even close borders to curb the spreading of the virus. Only its member countries can do that. That’s just what they did by introducing a ban on entry to the 26-state Schengen zone.

In the absence of a pan-EU approach to COVID-19, each country is enacting its own response and, ultimately, its overall containment strategy.

In the absence of a pan-EU approach to COVID-19, each country is enacting its own response, not only in terms of timing but also of the choice of the instruments and, ultimately, its overall containment strategy. These country-by-country restrictions already affect more than 200 million EU citizens. As time passes, many more will soon find themselves affected by this unprecedented compression of personal freedom in our liberal democracies.

What are the consequences of this lack of coordination?

The coexistence of these starkly divergent and often contradictory approaches to COVID-19 on the same continent is already producing some major, unintended and costly consequences.
 
The most tangible one is the reintroduction of border control measures among the 26 EU Schengen countries. Although border restrictions do not entail any major health gain but rather slow the free movement of workers and goods needed in an emergency, they are a response to the inability of Union’s member states to devise a coordinated action plan preventing those cross-border movements from happening.

Border restrictions are a response to the inability of Union’s member states to devise a coordinated action plan preventing those cross-border movements from happening.

Ultimately, the European handling of COVID-19 has unveiled an uncomfortable truth. Given the unprecedented level of socio-economic interconnectedness existing on our continent, nation-state solutions could do more harm than good by offering a mere illusion of security and safety for its people.

man wearing a mask in an airport
"The EU cannot even close borders to curb the spreading of the virus. Only its member countries can do that."
(Photo Credits: ©TeamDaf on AdobeStock)

What do you think they could do better, if they could, considering cultural differences in terms of decision-making process?

There’s reason to believe that should a EU-wide coordinated response be organised, not only would border restrictions be avoided (as they would no longer be justified) but the choice of the containment interventions would benefit from a greater variety of advice, perspectives and a wider public debate.

As a point of reference, let’s take the regions of EU member states, such as the Basque region - which stretches across France and Spain - not exclusively their unitary territories France or Spain. Let’s consider these regions as they stretch across European state borders. Measures designed at such a local scale would also be more tailored, proportionate to their declared goals, and potentially more freedom-preserving. As such, the health effectiveness, as well as legitimacy of the current (often draconian) national risk interventions would be enhanced.

Would you like to give any advice on how to deal with diversity through leadership in the EU area?

As each national approach against COVID-19 entails different trade-offs, and those spill over to other countries, there is a moral — albeit not yet legal — argument for our national leaders to coordinate their public health interventions as a matter of urgency.

As more and more European citizens move to imposed or self-imposed home confinement, the imperative for national leaders to think, act and protect Europeans, regardless of whether they count among their voters or not, is set to grow more urgent than ever.

In my view, the EU 27 health ministers could - on a voluntary basis - decide to pool their sovereign emergency powers.

In my view, the EU 27 health ministers could - on a voluntary basis - decide to pool their sovereign emergency powers. They could start coordinating their health response, by taking a common line on testing, containment, quarantine and social distancing. While not compelled by the European Union, national leaders are increasingly expected to do so by a European public up in arms.

 

Listen to Alberto Alemanno on the HEC Paris podcast:

 

Related content on Governance

Strategy

Why Activist Hedge Funds Target Socially Responsible Firms, and How Executives and Investors Can Counteract Them

By Mark Desjardine, Rodolphe Durand

woman talking at a meeting - Seventyfour-AdobeStock
Finance

How Corporate Political Activism Fuels Innovation

By Alexei Ovtchinnikov

design thinking Thales Bordeaux - Thales
Technology and Innovation

4 Lessons from Bringing Design Thinking into a Business

lay off ©pict_rider_AdobeStock vignette
Strategy

Activist Hedge Funds: Good for Some, Bad for Others?

By Mark Desjardine, Rodolphe Durand

Newsletter knowledge

A monthly brief in your email box and 3 issues of the book per year.

follow us

Insights @HECParis School of #Management

Follow Us

Support Research

Our articles are produced thanks to our reader's support