Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Campus
Life
Campus
Life
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
Stories Stories
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Degree Program Degree Program
Executive certificates Executive certificates
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
About

Four questions for HEC Associate Professor Jeremy Ghez on the U.S. Economy

The inauguration of Joe Biden as 46th President of the United States today is a momentous ceremony after a tumultuous presidential election and its aftermath. The economic and health challenges facing the new administration are immense, and the vicissitudes of the election have obscured substantive debate on the future of the Biden era. To help draw a clearer picture, Jeremy Ghez, Associate Professor of Economics and Decision Sciences and co-director of the HEC Paris Center for Geopolitics, highlights the main economic prerogatives that will structure the beginning of this mandate.

The White House in Washington, by night.

(© Unsplash.com – Tabrez Syed)

Jeremy Ghez, Associate Professor, HEC Paris.
Jeremy Ghez

What are the biggest economic challenges facing the Biden administration in the long-term? How do they tally with his promises during the election campaign? 

This Biden administration needs to: 1) Find an effective solution to the health crisis which may claim more lives than the Civil War (and American losses in World War Two; ed.); 2) Implement a rescue plan for the US economy in a political context that is far from consensual and, 3) Persuade Congress to improve on the President’s Cabinet Choices.

All of this will happen at the same time as the Senate deals with the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump. We know the importance of the first hundred days of an American President. This case is no different, and the first hundred days of the Biden administration may be even more important to some extent as they are likely to shape this president’s momentum and ability to carry his agenda throughout his mandate.

Biden’s $1.9tn economic package unveiled on January 14 is a wide-ranging plan including COVID-19 relief, $2,000 stimulus checks to each American household and ramping up unemployment insurance. How would you characterize such an injection of funds in terms of the long-term evolution of the U.S. economy? He has said this plan “won’t come cheaply”. What does he mean, do you think? 

There’s a lot of signaling on Biden’s end. The idea that it “won’t come cheaply” means several things in my opinion. First, this is “emergency spending” so it does not have to be offset, according to the incoming administration. Second, it won’t be politically cheap, and you can expect a significant arm-wrestling match both within Congress, and between Congress and the White House. Last, but not least, this may just be a beginning given how significant this health crisis is.

More generally, these stimulus checks are important because other measures, like raising the minimum wage, tackling long-term unemployment and/or supporting state governments are likely to take a lot of time — time that this administration thinks it does not have. Direct payments to Americans are likely to be more effective, even if the fiscal question is one that any country, America included, will need to address.

American flag with buildings
(© Unsplash.com – Nik Shuliahin)

The 46th U.S. President has an unexpected ally in the person of Bernie Sanders, the former Democratic presidential candidate who runs the powerful Senate budget committee. How important is it for Biden to have such cross-partisan support from within his ruling party in order to drive forward his economic policies (plans like almost doubling minimum wage to $15/hour)? 

President Biden faces a lot of pressure from within his party as well. Looking for compromises may be as hard with some of the more progressive figures of the Democratic party like Bernie Sanders, as it will with Republicans. In theory, the idea that an economic boost would benefit the country as a whole is pretty consensual. The moment this becomes a political debate in the United States is when all bets are off when it comes to anticipating outcomes.

Whilst he has made domestic policies his priority, how would you characterize his engagement on the international economic front? 

The domestic priorities of Joe Biden are so central that they are shaping his foreign policy as well. As his advisors have stated, he wants a foreign policy for the middle class. In practice, he ultimately won this election thanks to three states: Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania (the very same states that flipped Republican and that led to Donald Trump’s victory in 2016). These states share a common feature: the concentration of losers of globalization is quite significant in each one of these states. As a result, I don’t expect a lot of changes in terms of substance when it comes to Joe Biden’s foreign policy, especially when it comes to global trade and to China.

Of course, you can expect the tone to change. Joe Biden is known for his diplomatic skills as well. But on substance, Biden and his advisors still consider China to be a threat, not only when it comes to trade, but also on the issues of security, technology and intellectual property. And the President also seems to give credit to this notion that globalization may be a zero-sum game, not the win-win situation former politicians have thought it to be. Therefore, he believes protecting American interests is all the more vital. This is why a foreign policy for the US middle class is a phrase that captures this incoming administration’s intentions well.

Jeremy Ghez is associate professor of economics and decision sciences at HEC Paris and co-director of the school’s Center for Geopolitics. He was named one of Poets&Quants’ 40 Under 40 Professors in 2019. Ghez is the author of Etats-Unis: déclin improbable, rebond impossible and Architects of Change