Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC Faculty & Research Faculty & Research Master’s programs Master’s programs MBA Programs MBA Programs PhD Program PhD Program Executive Education Executive Education Summer School Summer School HEC Online HEC Online About HEC Overview Overview Who
We Are Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances HEC Talents HEC Talents International International Campus
Life Campus
Sustainability Sustainability Diversity
& Inclusion Diversity
& Inclusion
Stories Stories The HEC
Foundation The HEC
Coronavirus Coronavirus
Faculty & Research Overview Overview Faculty Directory Faculty Directory Departments Departments Centers Centers Chairs Chairs Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC Master’s programs Master in
Management Master in
Programs Master's
Double Degree
Programs Double Degree
Programs Summer
students Exchange
Life Student
Difference Our
MBA Programs MBA MBA Executive MBA Executive MBA TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA PhD Program Overview Overview HEC Difference HEC Difference Program details Program details Research areas Research areas HEC Community HEC Community Placement Placement Job Market Job Market Admissions Admissions Financing Financing Executive Education Executive Masters Executive Masters Executive Certificates Executive Certificates Executive short programs Executive short programs Online Online Companies Companies Executive MBA Executive MBA Infinity Pass Infinity Pass Summer School Youth Programs Youth Programs Summer programs Summer programs HEC Online Overview Overview Degree Program Degree Program Executive certificates Executive certificates MOOCs MOOCs Summer Programs Summer Programs Youth programs Youth programs
Faculty & Research

Research by Daniel Schmidt Accepted in the Review of Asset Pricing Studies

Associate Professor of Finance Daniel Schmidt has had his research paper “Fundamental Arbitrage under the Microscope: Evidence from Detailed Hedge Fund Transaction Data” accepted for publication in the Review of Asset Pricing Studies, one of the best journals in financial asset pricing. The research is in collaboration with Bastian von Beschwitz from the Federal Reserve Board and Sandro Lunghi from Inalytics.

Review of Asset Pricing

Fundamental trading, or trading on information acquired through fundamental research, is important for rendering stock market prices more informative. Yet, because of a paucity of data from real-world fundamental traders, we know very little about this activity and its limits. In this paper, we conduct the first detailed study on the limits of fundamental trading by exploiting a rich proprietary transaction data set for a sample of 21 hedge funds over a 10-year period. Two features make the data unique: First, it exclusively covers discretionary long-short equity hedge funds, which routinely undertake independent long and short investments (“directional bets”), making them archetypical fundamental arbitrageurs. Second, our data comprise all their stock transactions, allowing us to exactly pinpoint the dates when they enter and close their arbitrage positions.

In our data, we find that the long-short equity hedge funds behave like informed but constrained fundamental investors. Specifically, we show that their openings of long and short positions are followed by significant four-factor alphas with an absolute magnitude of about 1% over the next 125 trading days, suggesting that these hedge funds are skilled. When measured over the holding period (i.e., from opening to close), the difference in four-factor alpha between long and short positions amounts to 2%. In stark contrast, we find that closing trades are followed by returns in the opposite direction of the closing trade. When we design a trading strategy that goes long in stocks in which hedge funds just closed a long position (long sells) and shorts stocks from closed short positions (short buys), we obtain a significant four-factor alpha of about 0.9% over the next 125 trading days. This figure implies that the hedge funds in our sample forgo about one-third of the trade's potential profitability. We thus establish that the constraints faced by long-short equity hedge funds are economically important as they force them to “leave substantial money on the table.” We argue that hedge funds close positions early to reallocate their capital to more profitable investments and/or to accommodate tightened financial constraints. Consistent with this view, we document that hedge funds leave more money on the table after opening new positions, negative returns, or increases in funding constraints and volatility.