Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC Faculty & Research Faculty & Research Master’s programs Master’s programs MBA Programs MBA Programs PhD Program PhD Program Executive Education Executive Education Summer School Summer School HEC Online HEC Online About HEC Overview Overview Who We Are Who We Are Egalité des chances Egalité des chances Career Center Career Center International International Campus Life Campus Life Sustainability Sustainability Diversity & Inclusion Diversity & Inclusion Stories Stories The HEC Foundation The HEC Foundation Faculty & Research Overview Overview Faculty Directory Faculty Directory Departments Departments Centers Centers Chairs Chairs Knowledge Knowledge Master’s programs Master in
Management Master in
Management
MSc International
Finance MSc International
Finance
Specialized
Masters Specialized
Masters
X-HEC
programs X-HEC
programs
Dual-Degree
programs Dual-Degree
programs
Visiting
students Visiting
students
Certificates Certificates Student
Life Student
Life
Student
Stories Student
Stories
MBA Programs MBA MBA Executive MBA Executive MBA TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA PhD Program Overview Overview HEC Difference HEC Difference Program details Program details Research areas Research areas HEC Community HEC Community Placement Placement Job Market Job Market Admissions Admissions Financing Financing Executive Education Executive Masters Executive Masters Executive Certificates Executive Certificates Executive short programs Executive short programs Online Online Train your teams Train your teams Executive MBA Executive MBA Summer School Youth Programs Youth Programs Summer programs Summer programs HEC Online Overview Overview Degree Program Degree Program Executive certificates Executive certificates MOOCs MOOCs
Faculty & Research

When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact

04 Mar -
2021 -
1:30 pm
Paris
English

Participate

Add to Calendar
2021-03-04T13:30:00 2021-04-15T09:58:22 When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact Strategy & Business Policy Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN  Professor ESMT Berlin Videoconference Paris

Strategy & Business Policy

Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN 

Professor ESMT Berlin

Videoconference

Abstract

There have long been concerns that the professional scientific system puts too little weight on the social benefits (and costs) of research when setting research agendas. A growing number of mechanisms seek to address this concern, including explicit calls for “broader impacts” by funding agencies as well as participation of non-scientific actors such as patient organizations in policy and funding decisions. The most novel mechanisms allow individual citizens to directly influence research agendas by voting on research proposals or funding research projects with their own money. Although there is a hope that such mechanisms can help “democratize” science and steer research towards greater societal relevance, it is not clear how crowds evaluate the potential social impact of research projects, and what role social impact plays relative to other criteria.

To examine this question, we asked over 2,000 crowd members to evaluate funding proposals written for the general public in the social, natural, and medical sciences. We elicited assessments of different project attributes (e.g., scientific merit, researcher capabilities, social impact), recommendations for funding, as well as real donations using personal money.

Using these data, we first confirm the common assumption that crowd members put a high weight on social impact when evaluating research projects. We then analyze how judgments of social impact relate to individual level attributes such as level of education, income, and personal relevance of the project topic. Qualitative data provide additional insights into what exactly people think about when judging projects’ social impact. Finally, although social impact is inherently subjective, we seek to gain initial insights into the accuracy of crowd judgments. Towards this end, we compare crowd judgments to an “objective” indicator of problem importance available in the medical sciences (the Burden of Disease, which reflects both the number of people affected by a disease and the severity of the resulting conditions).

Our study contributes to the literatures in science and innovation management as well as crowdsourcing. We also discuss implications for scientists, funding agencies, and policy makers.

Participate

Add to Calendar
2021-03-04T13:30:00 2021-04-15T09:58:22 When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact Strategy & Business Policy Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN  Professor ESMT Berlin Videoconference Paris