Aller au contenu principal
A propos d'HEC A propos d'HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculté et Recherche Faculté et Recherche
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
Programme PhD Programme PhD
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
A propos d'HEC
En bref En bref
Qui sommes-nous ? Qui sommes-nous ?
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Vie du campus Vie du campus
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversité et inclusion Diversité et inclusion
Stories Stories
Fondation HEC Fondation HEC
Summer School
Youth programs Youth programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculté et Recherche
À propos À propos
Corps professoral Corps professoral
Départements Départements
Centres Centres
Chaires Chaires
Financements Financements
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Grande Ecole
& Masters
Grande Ecole
Master in Management
Grande Ecole
Master in Management
Programmes
Masters
Programmes
Masters
Doubles
Diplômes
Doubles
Diplômes
Programmes
Bachelor
Programmes
Bachelor
Programmes
Summer
Programmes
Summer
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Vie
Etudiante
Vie
Etudiante
Notre
différence
Notre
différence
Bachelor Programs
Vue d'ensemble Vue d'ensemble
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
Programme PhD
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Accueil Accueil
Qui sommes-nous ? Qui sommes-nous ?
Univers de formation Univers de formation
Programmes Programmes
Offres entreprises Offres entreprises
Événements/Actualités Événements/Actualités
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
En bref En bref
Programme diplômant Programme diplômant
Certificats Executive Certificats Executive
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Faculté et Recherche

When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact

04 Mar
2021
13H30
Paris
Anglais

Participer

Ajouter au calendrier
2021-03-04T13:30:00 2024-06-16T20:47:06 When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact Strategy & Business Policy Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN  Professor ESMT Berlin Videoconference Paris

Strategy & Business Policy

Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN 

Professor ESMT Berlin

Videoconference

Abstract

There have long been concerns that the professional scientific system puts too little weight on the social benefits (and costs) of research when setting research agendas. A growing number of mechanisms seek to address this concern, including explicit calls for “broader impacts” by funding agencies as well as participation of non-scientific actors such as patient organizations in policy and funding decisions. The most novel mechanisms allow individual citizens to directly influence research agendas by voting on research proposals or funding research projects with their own money. Although there is a hope that such mechanisms can help “democratize” science and steer research towards greater societal relevance, it is not clear how crowds evaluate the potential social impact of research projects, and what role social impact plays relative to other criteria.

To examine this question, we asked over 2,000 crowd members to evaluate funding proposals written for the general public in the social, natural, and medical sciences. We elicited assessments of different project attributes (e.g., scientific merit, researcher capabilities, social impact), recommendations for funding, as well as real donations using personal money.

Using these data, we first confirm the common assumption that crowd members put a high weight on social impact when evaluating research projects. We then analyze how judgments of social impact relate to individual level attributes such as level of education, income, and personal relevance of the project topic. Qualitative data provide additional insights into what exactly people think about when judging projects’ social impact. Finally, although social impact is inherently subjective, we seek to gain initial insights into the accuracy of crowd judgments. Towards this end, we compare crowd judgments to an “objective” indicator of problem importance available in the medical sciences (the Burden of Disease, which reflects both the number of people affected by a disease and the severity of the resulting conditions).

Our study contributes to the literatures in science and innovation management as well as crowdsourcing. We also discuss implications for scientists, funding agencies, and policy makers.

Participer

Ajouter au calendrier
2021-03-04T13:30:00 2024-06-16T20:47:06 When Crowds Judge Science: Citizens’ Evaluations of Project Social Impact Strategy & Business Policy Speaker: Henry SAUERMANN  Professor ESMT Berlin Videoconference Paris