Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Campus
Life
Campus
Life
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
Stories Stories
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Degree Program Degree Program
Executive certificates Executive certificates
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
About

US-based firms dominate the latest HEC Paris-DowJones Private Equity ‘Fund of Funds’ performance ranking

In its 2nd edition, the ranking evaluates PE firms investing in other PE firms at an international level. Newcomers Union Grove Venture Partners, Peakview Capital, and Cross Creek took the first three spots.

A new study conducted by Strategy Professor Oliver Gottschalg from HEC Paris has revealed that US-based ‘Fund of Fund’ firms dominate the worldwide rankings.

The top eight firms in 2022 HEC Paris-DowJones PE Fund of Funds Performance Ranking are all US-based, suggesting that firms with strong US roots and relationships have been effective at providing access to top venture capital opportunities.

This year’s edition also showed that none of the better-known firms in the ‘fund of funds’ segment made it to the top ten, with Union Grove Venture Partners, Peakview Capital, and Cross Creek taking the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd positions respectively.

The ranking set out to answer the question: “Which firms in the Primary Fund of Funds segment generated the best performance for their investors based on funds raised between 2009 and 2018?”

The study looks at the firms who have invested in other private equity firms by becoming limited partners.

The top performers demonstrate their ability to navigate the challenging landscape of the Private Equity industry. According to Prof. Gottschalg, it is quite remarkable that despite this, the most well-known brand names in the industry did not make it to the top ten: “This finding challenges the notion that brand recognition and size are the sole indicators of success in the Fund of Funds space," he explains.

This observation raises the question of whether the lack of prominent brand names is due to incomplete performance data or if it signifies the remarkable performance achieved by lesser-known firms.

Professor Gottschalg also found that six out of the top ten performers raised less than 1 billion USD cumulatively over the decade of vintages (2009-2018) considered in this study.

Methodology

The ranking draws on a comprehensive set of data on PE fund performance sourced from preqin and directly from PE Firms using a unique methodology to calculate the aggregate performance of a PE firm based on different performance measures for all the funds managed by this firm.

The aggregate performance score can only be interpreted relative to the average aggregate performance score of all firms analysed.

A total of 99 Fund of Fund Managers and their 454 funds raised between 2009 and 2018, with an aggregate equity volume of $131 billion, were analysed to determine the top performers in the primary Fund of Funds segment.

 

The 2022 HEC Paris-DowJones PE Fund of Funds Performance Ranking:

Rank

Firm

Performance Score

Headquarters

1

Union Grove Venture Partners

1.76

USA

2

Peakview Capital

1.60

USA

3

Cross Creek

1.58

USA

4

Performance Equity Management

1.03

USA

5

Horsley Bridge Partners

0.85

USA

6

Bay Hills Capital

0.81

USA

7

Accolade Partners

0.67

USA

8

Glouston Capital Partners

0.59

USA

9

SwanCap Partners

0.48

Germany

10

Schroders Capital

0.31

UK

 

The Private Equity industry has long been shrouded in opacity, making access to reliable data a challenge. However, the HEC Paris-DowJones PE Fund of Funds Performance Ranking aims to address this issue by shedding light on the performance and competitive behaviour of key PE firms.

Since 2009, HEC Paris and DowJones have joined forces to publish regular rankings based on historic performance and expected future competitiveness.

The study selected all those Fund of Funds Managers that met the following objective criteria:

  • At least 2 funds which raised over the 2009 to 2018 period for which full performance information is available;
  • Performance data available on all of these the funds
  • Over $200m raised during this time;
  • Investments in US, EU or global
  • At least 10 observation years (i.e. the sum of the 'age' of all funds as of today);

Using a unique methodology, the ranking calculates the aggregate performance of a PE firm based on different performance measures for all the funds managed by that firm.

This methodology allows for the aggregation of performance across vintage years while considering relative and absolute returns.