Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Campus
Life
Campus
Life
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
Stories Stories
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Degree Program Degree Program
Executive certificates Executive certificates
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Article

Decision Making: Why Do We Underestimate Rare Events?

Decision Sciences
Published on:

Uncertainty accompanies most individual and collective decisions. Given the unknown probabilities of available options, people make choices based on experience. But this way of functioning is biased: it leads to underestimating or ignoring rare events. This could explain, for example, why in 2005 only half of the colossal damage caused by the North Atlantic hurricanes in the U.S. was covered by insurance. Mohammed Abdellaoui and his co-authors set out to understand this surprising phenomenon.

The black swan theory was developed by the scholar Nassim Nicholas Taleb to describe unforeseeable, low probability events with significant consequences.

Subjective perception of "described" uncertainty

In the study, when decision makers chose based on descriptions of probability distributions, they tended to feel an increase in the probability of a somewhat likely loss (50% chance of losing €1000) less strongly than the same increase in the probability of a very unlikely loss (5% risk of losing €1000 euros) or an almost certain loss (95% risk of losing €1000). This behavior is also observed for gains. In the language of prospect theory, this means that decision makers facing uncertainty overestimate small probabilities and underestimate moderate and high probabilities. The study of Abdellaoui and his co-authors confirms this result.

 

How the information is communicated influences people’s perceptions.


Small samples and short memory

On the one hand, in an uncertain context, policy makers tend to trust conclusions based on very small samples: they need few examples to form an opinion. In addition, decision makers tend to draw lessons from more recent situations. For example, after a natural disaster, the inhabitants of the devastated region are often inclined to get insurance. But a significant portion of those who sign up in the immediate aftermath of the disaster will terminate their contract a few years later.

Presentation of the information

Finally, how the information is communicated influences people’s perceptions. A dull description using figures presented in terms of probabilities does not have the same impact on behavior as information gained through experience. Road safety campaigns focused on communicating accident rates have little success, whereas signs indicating that fatalities have occurred at that particular location have greater impact. Besides the fact that statistics have little capacity to provoke uncertainty, they are sometimes misunderstood and misused, even by the most sophisticated decision makers. In an uncertain context, these factors contribute to incoherent decisions that may have costly negative, economic consequences.

Applications

Focus - Application pour les marques
In the two contexts of uncertainty studied by Abdellaoui and his co-authors, individual behavior diverges from the predictions of the standard model of rationality, or the expected utility model. When individuals make decisions based on experience (rather than known options), their behavior also differs from predictions of prospect theory, causing them to underestimate or ignore rare events. Awareness of these phenomena and understanding their causes can help improve and modernize practices in risk management. In particular, it would be possible to take into account the fact that even well-trained decision makers are not immune to statistical or behavioral bias.

Methodology

methodology
Abdellaoui and his co-authors compared the choices observed in laboratory experiments with those predicted by the prospect theory of Tversky and Kahneman (1992) in two contexts. In the first, individuals chose between alternatives described in the form of probability distributions (“described” risk). In the second, the decision maker discovered each alternative through a sampling process of unknown probability distribution (“experienced” risk).
Based on an interview with Mohammed Abdellaoui and the article “Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications?” by Mohammed Abdellaoui, Olivier L’Haridon, and Corina Paraschiv published in Management Science in June 2011.

Related content on Decision Sciences

Decision Sciences

Risking the future? How Delayed Consequences Can Bias the Perception of Risk

By Emmanuel Kemel

Brian Hill GREGHEC
Brian Hill
CNRS Research Professor
Emmanuel Kemel HEC professor
Emmanuel Kemel
CNRS Research Professor
Economics

How Much to Reveal to Persuade a Decision Maker?

By Tristan Tomala, Marie Laclau, Frédéric Koessler

Photo Credits: Fergregory / Adobe Stock

Decision Sciences

Black Swans and Other Challenges to Rational Decision Making

By Stefania Minardi, Itzhak Gilboa