Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC Faculty & Research Faculty & Research Master’s programs Master’s programs MBA Programs MBA Programs PhD Program PhD Program Executive Education Executive Education Summer School Summer School HEC Online HEC Online About HEC Overview Overview Who We Are Who We Are Egalité des chances Egalité des chances Career Center Career Center International International Campus Life Campus Life Stories Stories The HEC Foundation The HEC Foundation Faculty & Research Overview Overview Faculty Directory Faculty Directory Departments Departments Centers Centers Chairs Chairs Knowledge Knowledge Master’s programs Master in
Management Master in
Management
MSc International
Finance MSc International
Finance
Specialized
Masters Specialized
Masters
X-HEC
programs X-HEC
programs
Dual-Degree
programs Dual-Degree
programs
Visiting students Visiting students Certificates Certificates Student Life Student Life
MBA Programs MBA MBA EMBA EMBA TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA PhD Program Overview Overview HEC Difference HEC Difference Program details Program details Research areas Research areas HEC Community HEC Community Placement Placement Job Market Job Market Admissions Admissions Financing Financing Executive Education Executive Masters Executive Masters Executive Certificates Executive Certificates Executive short programs Executive short programs Online Online Train your teams Train your teams Summer School Youth Leadership Initiative Youth Leadership Initiative Summer programs Summer programs Admissions Admissions FAQ FAQ HEC Online Overview Overview Degree Program Degree Program Executive certificates Executive certificates MOOCs MOOCs

Article

Does environmental proactivity pay?

Ethics

For a firm to be profitable, does it need to listen to all its stakeholders? And what happens if a firm is sensitive to stakeholder demands and proactive about environmental issues? Bertrand Quelin’s latest research reveals a surprising correlation between these seemingly disparate business issues.

Bertrand Quelin, HEC Paris ©bozzeny-AdobeStock

Companies face increasing pressures to reduce the negative impacts of their activities on the environment. As always, they are also under pressure to increase profits. Is it difficult to combine these two achievements, or can they come hand-in-hand? Professor Bertrand Quélin asks, “If a company improves its environmental sustainability – does it pay?”

Balancing act: weighing up stakeholder interests

Every company has a variety of stakeholders (employees, customers, suppliers, shareholders, organizations and associations of professionals and consumers) – and they all have different interests and priorities. Invariably some stakeholders will favor environmental sustainability policies. Whatever their interests are, they need to be strategically managed by companies to ensure maximum profitability. To gain insight into what is often a tangled knot of opposing and aligning interests, Quélin and his research team measured how attentive a company is to the interests of all its relevant stakeholders. “We wanted to see how company stakeholder orientation impacts profitability. At the same time, managers are increasingly concerned about their corporate social and environmental responsibilities and are proactive about this, so we also wanted to understand the impact of these behaviors.” 

The intersection between environmental proactivity, stakeholder interests, and profitability 

To understand the links between stakeholder orientation, environmental proactivity and profitability, the team collected data on the food and beverage industry and the household and personal products industry. These sectors were selected as they are essential to our modern lives. They also have significant socio-environmental impact through their manufacturing, packaging and distribution processes. Stakeholders then include suppliers of packaging, spare parts and equipment; wholesalers and distributors, transport companies, factories-stores...

 

A company that is attentive to a broad range of stakeholders will improve its profitability if it is also environmentally proactive. 

 

Analysis by structural equation modelling found that, overall, it does not seem to pay if too much attention is given to too many stakeholders. There is a negative link between companies with high stakeholder orientation and their profitability. One of the main reasons for this is thought to be that when resources are dedicated to a wide range of stakeholders to create long-term value, what you see is an immediate loss in profitability. In addition, Quélin notes that although there is added value in the company, this is not reflected in traditional monetary profits. 

However, when environmental proactivity is added to the mix, this effect is reversed. High stakeholder orientation coupled with company investment in environmental sustainability becomes a positive driver of company profitability: “Environmental proactivity mediates the link between stakeholder orientation and profitability. This means that a company that is attentive to a broad range of stakeholders will improve its profitability if it is also environmentally proactive.” 

Environmental innovation drives profits 

The two industries examined in this study are oligopolies: they are dominated by a few large companies that call the shots. “In contrast to economic theory, our results show that members of an oligopoly can benefit if they innovate,” Quélin explains. “In acting fast to redesign processes to become more environmentally friendly, they become recognized by customers as an environmental leader. Consequently, they benefit financially.” Quélin then broadens the view to include other industries: “Stakeholders and end-users are sensitive to environmental policies, so it is important that all industries start to adopt proactive environmental policies. Management theory says that innovation comes at a cost, but here we show that proactivity can pay.” 

In acting fast to redesign processes to become more environmentally friendly, they become recognized by customers as an environmental leader. Consequently, they benefit financially. 

When asked for any concluding advice, Quelin offers: “There is an ethical responsibility for all companies to pay attention to environmental issues. They need to consider what is being left for the next generation and this goes beyond imposed regulations. They have a responsibility to engage in proactive behavior towards the environment and, when combined with stakeholder orientation, this can drive profits up.” 

Applications

Image - Social Networks
Companies are often under the impression that making processes more environmentally friendly and sustainable comes at a cost. However, in contradiction to traditional ideas, this work shows that environmental proactivity can be beneficial financially: “Companies need to take note that, if stakeholder orientation and environmental proactivity are managed well, over time this can improve company performance,” Quélin advises. “Companies that are part of oligopolies should be aware that in moving quickly with policies they can become industry leaders and reap maximum benefits."

Methodology

methodology
Quélin, Brulhart and Gherra used structural equation modelling to explore the links between stakeholder orientation, environmental proactivity and profitability. The team collected data on two industries: the food and beverage industry and the household and personal products industry. Data on these ubiquitous industries can have significant socio-environmental impact due to their manufacturing, packaging and distribution processes. In their analysis, they found that environmentally proactivity can mediate a negative link between stakeholder orientation and profitability. They see that environmentally proactive companies are more attentive to a broad array of stakeholders, and this in turn increases their profitability.
Based on an interview with Bertrand V. Quélin on his paper “Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?” coauthored with Franck Brulhart and Sandrine Gherra (Journal of Business Ethics, 2017).

Related content on Ethics

Dow Chemical plant in South Charleston, West Virginia. West Virginia Collection within the Carol M. Highsmith Archive—Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (LC-DIG-highsm-31713)
Strategy

Walking the talk: why companies should be politically transparent

Afshin Mehrpouya TedTalk
Regulation

The rise of rankings in global governance: how can they change the regulation of large corporations?

By Afshin Mehrpouya

Students in MBA lounge
Reinventing Business Education

Posing dilemmas: an MBA ethics course incites students to question themselves and their beliefs

By Afshin Mehrpouya

Business Education Innovation In Depth - vignette
Reinventing Business Education

Reinventing Business Education

By Marc Vanhuele

whistleblowers HEC professors knowledge
Management Control - Audit

How storytelling can increase support for whistleblowers

By Hervé Stolowy, Luc Paugam