Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Campus life Campus life
Activity Reports Activity Reports
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Executive programs Executive programs
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Article

How is AI Really Impacting Jobs? A Nuanced Approach

How is AI Really Impacting Jobs? A Nuanced Approach
Economics
Published on:

Many studies have attempted to estimate the potential effects of technological change on employment and the labor market in France. In March 2024, Emmanuel Macron received the first report from the Committee on Generative Artificial Intelligence, which partly utilizes the recent study by HEC economics professor Antonin Bergeaud. The report concludes that jobs directly replaceable by AI would only represent 5% of the jobs in a country like France, and automation could affect between 10% and 20% of workers, with a high prevalence among managers. In this article, we present the results of these analyses in context.

antonin bergeaud on AI_cover

First, why study the effects of AI on employment?

Many economists perceive the rapid development of AI as a major technological revolution. Yet, there is no real consensus on its consequences for productivity and employment.

From an economic point of view, it is important to study the effect of AI on labor productivity and employment, including reallocations, employee characteristics, and the professions involved. Understanding whether AI primarily impacts certain tasks rather than entire jobs is essential.

 

Understanding whether AI primarily impacts certain tasks rather than entire jobs is essential.

 

Indeed, AI could accelerate the obsolescence of human capital and transform working methods, raising questions about the evolution of wages and employees' bargaining power.

By facilitating task automation, AI could negatively affect labor demand in certain sectors, where some tasks would now be performed by machines.

On the other hand, AI could also lead to significant productivity gains and job creation in complementary sectors.

Studies in France and the United States highlight job creation and the need for training

In the United States, in 2023, a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research showed that implementing an AI tool to assist customer service employees in responding to inquiries increased their productivity by 25%. This productivity increase far outpaces eliminating certain positions, as AI can also improve workers' performance.

In France, the report submitted to Emmanuel Macron by the Committee on Generative Artificial Intelligence on March 13, 2024, also explains that AI could have a positive impact on employment, but only if its dissemination is accompanied by investments in training and better inclusion of staff representatives.

The study, like Bergeaud's, is based on data from INSEE, the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, showing that companies that adopted AI systems between 2018 and 2020 saw their employment numbers increase faster than those that did not adopt these technologies. These new technologies have thus created jobs that did not exist before 2018.

In his January 2024 note, Antonin Bergeaud concludes that automation could affect about 20% of workers, with a high prevalence among managers. The researcher focused on precisely analyzing the tasks performed by an average employee in 220 different professions, which allowed him to identify the professions likely to be highly automated and those that would benefit in terms of productivity and new skills.

Methodology and data

The Commission chaired by Aghion and Bouverot and Bergeaud use the same method and data. To evaluate the impact of AI, Antonin Bergeaud analyzed 16,937 tasks related to 220 professions from the O*NET database. For each task, he applied the GPT-4 model with specific instructions (or prompts) and assigned a score to measure the potential for substitutability, that is, the likelihood that the task could be performed by AI in the near future. By integrating the potentials for substitution and complementarity (if AI collaborates with a human to enhance their skills), he calculated the proportion of tasks difficult to automate for each profession.

 

Between 10% and 20% of employment are at risk with AI, which is a lot, but less than some alarmist discourses suggest when they talk about a near-total disappearance of employment.

 

The professor details the limitations of these analyses: "In practice, what we can do is evaluate a kind of exposure score to AI profession by profession. Besides, the question we cannot definitively answer is 'where to set the threshold to determine that a job is at risk?' In my note and the report, the threshold has likely been set at different points, but we can say that the magnitude is between 10% and 20% of employment, which is a lot, but less than some alarmist discourses suggest when they talk about a near-total disappearance of employment."

The most impacted professions

Bergeaud thus finds that professions like secretaries, accountants, and telemarketers, which are highly exposed to AI and involve few complex tasks, are the most threatened. Other professions will also be transformed, even if they are not entirely replaced. Conversely, manual jobs, such as roofer, or relational ones, such as concierge, should be little affected by these transformations.

 
Figure 3, extracted from Bergeaud's note: Cumulative distribution of employment based on the risk of automation by AI.

 

Overall, Bergeaud estimates that the impact of AI should be positive due to significant time savings.

The EU develops the AI Act to protect work from AI

The development of AI also raises crucial questions about the evolution of employment and its legal framework. In response to these concerns, the European Union is preparing the Artificial Intelligence Act, a legal framework that aims to regulate AI uses, particularly in relation to employment. This framework imposes specific obligations on AI system providers based on the potential risks of their uses, categorizing, for example, AI systems related to employment as high-risk. It still needs to be formally adopted before its progressive entry into force starting in 2025.

In a nutshell

The study conducted by Antonin Bergeaud provides a nuanced view of the impact of AI on employment in France. Although 20% of jobs could be heavily impacted, AI also offers significant opportunities in terms of productivity gains and new job creation.

The importance of training and the inclusion of staff representatives is crucial to support this transition.

The development of AI must also be accompanied by an appropriate legal framework to ensure the ethical and secure use of these technologies.

Finally, by investing in research and training, France can leverage AI to improve productivity and create jobs while minimizing the risks of excessive automation.
 

Reference: Bergeaud A. (2024), "Exposition à l’intelligence artificielle générative et emploi : une application à la classification socio-professionnelle française" (« Exposition à l’intelligence artificielle générative et emploi : une application à la classification socio-professionnelle française »), Working Paper.